@inproceedings{oai:kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001923,
 author = {金, 美眞 and KIM, Mijin},
 book = {国際日本文学研究集会会議録, PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON JAPANESE LITERATURE},
 issue = {36},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {pdf, Ryutei Tanehiko was the foremost writer of gōkan, a form of illustrated novel, during the latter part of the Edo period. In the Bunka, Bunsei and Tenpou periods (1804-1844), a kind of annotation meant to explicate the culture of one hundred years prior based on literary evidence reached the height of its popularity. Tanehiko made many discoveries concerning the customs, language, haikai, kabuki and jōruri of the early part of the Edo period, and left behind many essays based on his research. The knowledge gleaned from this research was used in the writing of his gōkan. In this way, the customs and culture of early Edo were revived in the pages of these works.
In this presentation, I would like to investigate how the results of research were used in gōkan, taking Sogatayūzome (1817) as a primary example. According to the work's introduion, Chikamatsu Monzaemon's kyōgenbon Sogatayūzome from the Genroku period (1688-1704) is the source book. The introduction states that, in order to communicate the classical style to the readers, the themes of the original were left unchanged, while only the language was updated to that of the present day. One point reflecting the style of the day is that the characters' faces are drawn as actor's portraits of the same period Sogatayūzome was written by Tanehiko. However, this work also contains Tanehiko's idea for reviving the antique. They are the eight annotations on eight of the fifteen pages. These annotations explained such things as a character's hair, makeup, or part in the play, as well as old vocabulary from the Genroku period. Tanehiko used the manner of expression and classical style of one hundred years before in his works.
In this presentation, I will clarify the revival of Chikamatsu's kabuki in this work, in the light of these eight annotations. I will show that the reason for using annotation as a means for putting sources of research in the work is to show both the present-day and classical styles on the same page.},
 pages = {21--39},
 publisher = {国文学研究資料館},
 title = {研究発表　種彦合巻『曽我太夫染』における考証の方法　――八つの注釈をめぐって――},
 year = {2013},
 yomi = {キム, ミジン}
}