@inproceedings{oai:kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002726,
 author = {Mostafa, Ahmed and MOSTAFA, Ahmed},
 book = {国際日本文学研究集会会議録, PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON JAPANESE LITERATURE},
 issue = {30},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {pdf, 1. Defining “post-war”
2. “Post-war” for the winners and the losers
3. Japan’s defeat was unheard of
4. The connection between “post-war” and “the trauma of defeat”
5. Yasuoka Shoutarou is a proper member of the “post-war school” with his compelling telling of the history of Japan’s post-war psychology
6. Problems in post-war Japanese literature
(1) It is too early for scholars to declare the post-war era “over”
(2) Organizing divisions in post-war literary history. Why “the third newcomers” and not “the third post-war school”?
(3) Did the “post-war school” end in the early 1950s? Now, 60 years after the war, is not an unusual time for a new “post-war school” to appear in the literary world.
(4) The “phantomizing” of post-war Okinawan literature in post-war literary history. The need for an attempt at “unification” of post-war Japanese and Okinawan literary histories.
7. Memories of the battle for Okinawa and Okinawan post-war literature
8. Properly memorializing “post-war phantoms” should lead to “the end of the post-war era”},
 pages = {1--5},
 publisher = {国文学研究資料館},
 title = {講演　果たして戦後が終わったか　―日本戦後文学史読み直しへの試み―},
 year = {2007},
 yomi = {モスタファ, アハマド}
}