@inproceedings{oai:kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003725,
 author = {張, 硯君 and ZHANG, Yanjun},
 book = {第４１回　国際日本文学研究集会会議録, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41st INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON JAPANESE LITERATURE},
 issue = {41},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {pdf, ・Background and purpose of this study
The shōmono works on the Chinese classic “Daigaku”, are known to be classified into ten groups. In particular, works attributed to the lecturer Kiyohara Nobukata occupy an important position, but the fact that not only Nobukata’s memorandum of lectures（ tebikae 手控）, but also the lecture notes of students' records（ kikigaki 聞書） remain could be considered more important. The former, “Daigaku-chōjin”（ 大学聴塵）, is in Nobutaka’s own handwriting, and the latter have two systems being used in the present, distinguishing who is the recorder, and whether it’s told by Kiyohara Nobukata or not.
 In conventional research, it has been pointed out that “Daigaku-shō” which is attributed to the hand of Rin Sōwa of the Kyoto University was a record of Nobukata’s lecture. In terms of content, it reflects the commentary of Nobukata in similar ways as a memorandum does. However, from a postscript included in the oldest manuscript of Tenbun six（ 1537）, one of the originally burned versions of Sōwa’s system, it can be seen that this system was established through his lecture records with calibration and adjustments. Unfortunately, this point has not attracted enough attention. This study is aimed at finding out what parts of the contents can be seen as the collation of Rin Sōwa.
・Methods and results of the study
This study compares the“ Daigaku-shō” owned by the Kyoto University to the“ Seikei Four Books-shō” owned by Toyo Bunko, as well as the“ Daigakuchōjin” owned by Daitōkyū Kinen Bunko, and analyses the differences
between the Sōwa edition and the other two books. In particular, the contents only contained in “Daigaku-shō” are not the traditional theories based on Kiyohara Family, but could be considered as supplementary contents. We can surmise that Sōwa’s collations are included to a considerable degree because of the considerable proportion.
・Conclusion
Results shows that the completion of “Daigaku-shō” was based on Rin Sōwa’s own lecture records but completed by absorbing other reference books in order to make up for what was omitted from his lecture notes.},
 pages = {114--93},
 publisher = {人間文化研究機構　国文学研究資料館},
 title = {林宗和聞書抄『大学抄』の生成とその価値　――講述聞書における校合の実態をめぐって――},
 year = {2018},
 yomi = {チョウ, ケンクン}
}