@article{oai:kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000404,
 author = {福田, 秀一 and HUKUDA, HIDEICHI},
 issue = {10},
 journal = {国文学研究資料館紀要, The Bulletin of The National Institute of Japanese Literature},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {pdf, 鎌倉後期乃至未期に成った三つの私撰集，「続現葉集」(現存10巻。もと20巻か。元亨3年成り，同年増補か。撰者は為世か)・「臨永集」(10巻。元徳3年成る。撰者は未詳だが，浄弁が関係するか)・「松花集」（現存4巻余。もと10巻か。これも元徳3年成る。浄弁が関係し，或いは彼の撰か)は，二条派の当代歌人の集として当時の歌壇(観点によっては一部の武家教養屑をも含む)や歌風を探る資料として注意される上，互に関連を有し共通する作者も多いので，かつてこの三集を併せた形の作者索引を公にした(『武蔵大学人文学会雑誌』第三巻第二号，昭46.10)が，その後に発見された巻四・六等によって今回増補し，また気づいた誤を訂した。

 “Shokugen’yo-shu”（続現葉集）(10 existing volumes, 20 volumes formerly? , established in 1324 and enlarged in the same year? Is Tameyo an editor?) which were three private anthologies from the late to the end of Kamakura period,・“Rin’ei-shu”（臨永集）(10 volumes, established in 1331. An editor is unknown. Is Joben related?)・“Shokashu”（松花集）(more than 4 existing volumes, 10 volumes formerly? , also established in 1331, Joben is related or was he an editor?) are collections of the current poets in Nijo poetic school and they attracted notice as the material which investigates the waka circles of the time (This includes some educated Samurai families depending on a point of view) and a poetical style. In addition, since there are related each other and have much common authors, an author index of the form that integrated into those three collections were publicized (“Musashi University The Journal of Human and Cultural Sciences” Vol.3. No.2 Oct, 1971), they were enlarged and revised errors that I noticed by Vol.4 and 6 which were discovered afterwards.},
 pages = {225--279},
 title = {続現葉・臨永・松花三集作者索引},
 year = {1984},
 yomi = {フクダ, ヒデイチ}
}