@article{oai:kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000458,
 author = {山崎, 誠 and YAMAZAKI, Makoto},
 issue = {17},
 journal = {国文学研究資料館紀要, The Bulletin of The National Institute of Japanese Literature},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {唐代の類書「類林」は琱玉集や李瀚蒙求注の原資料として知られるばかりでなく、我が国に於いて読誦された確証もある。本書は複雑で不透明な生成過程を経る中世史漢物語の原資料としても注目される。小稿では現存する類林雑説・敦煌本類林・西夏本類林の三者の関係とその本文価値とを明らかにし、更に我が国に伝存する逸文を照し合せて本書の古態に迫ろうとするものである。

 A　similar work of Tang dynasty of “Leilin”（類林）is not only as a source material of  “Chougokushu”（琱玉集）and “ Rikanmogyuchu”（李瀚蒙求注）, but also there is conclusive evidence to be recited in our country. This book is also received attention as a source material of medieval history of Han story that the creation process is complicated and uncertain. In this article, a triadic relationship among extant “Leilin zassetsu”（類林雑説）, “Tonko bon leilin”（敦煌本類林）and “Seika bon leilin”（西夏本類林）and the text value were made clear. Moreover, surviving fragments passed down in our country were compared to approach the original form.},
 pages = {1--106},
 title = {「類林」追考 ―中世史漢物語の源流―},
 year = {1991},
 yomi = {ヤマザキ, マコト}
}