@article{oai:kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000592,
 author = {山崎, 誠 and YAMAZAKI, Makoto},
 issue = {24},
 journal = {国文学研究資料館紀要, The Bulletin of The National Institute of Japanese Literature},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {pdf, 鎌倉時代末年の成立かとされる『塵袋』は、その体裁を見るに、雑多の事項について問答体で製釈を加えた一種の類書である。引用文中の書名が直接引用であるのか、間接引用であるのかをはじめとして、原典と注釈類との関係などの扱いが煩雑である。それだけに機械的に引用書名をあげて、そこから編者や成立圏の問題を考えるのは、有力な異本もなく、殆どそれが唯一のてがかりとなるだけに、一層注意深くなければならない。古くから風土記逸文の引用などで知られる資料であるが、その外にも鎌倉末の書物の消息を語るものが多いのも事実である。このような編纂された書物に現れた逸文の弁別方法について考えてみたい。

 “Chiribukuro”（塵袋） which was believed to have been written at the end of Kamakura period, from its form, it was a kind of encyclopedia which was added explanatory notes by a dialogic writing about motley items. It is complicated to handle the relation with original and annotations, such as the title of a book of citations is whether a direct or indirect. Therefore to think about an issue of the editor and establishment areas giving credit to the quotation title of a book mechanically, it must be more careful because there is no other convincing alternative versions and it will almost become the only clue. It has been known as an old document quoted from “Fudoki-itsubun”（風土記逸文）,however it is also true that there are many documents telling the information of the book in the late Kamakura period. The discrimination method of surviving fragments that appeared in such an edited book will be considered.},
 pages = {121--153},
 title = {塵袋引書攷},
 year = {1998},
 yomi = {ヤマザキ, マコト}
}