{"created":"2023-05-15T14:48:45.006928+00:00","id":597,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"9465c1ba-9973-4823-a2e4-9e184072051c"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"597","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"597"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000597","sets":["1:372:373:37"]},"author_link":["16382","16383"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1998-03-29","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"24","bibliographicPageEnd":"348","bibliographicPageStart":"323","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国文学研究資料館紀要"},{"bibliographic_title":"The Bulletin of The National Institute of Japanese Literature","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"明治時代を通して、旧派・新派を問わず、類題句集が数多く出版された。筆者は先に明治期のいわゆる「旧派」の俳諧師たちの編纂した類題句集一○六点について調査し、それらの編纂の意図や太陽暦採用後の季の問題、さらに明治の新題について若干の考察を試みた。本稿はその続編ともいうべきもので、調査の範囲を新派の類題句集にまで広め、類題句集を編纂するに当たって、旧派・新派はそれぞれどのように募句を行っていたのか、また太陽暦採用後の季の扱い方や明治の新題の用い方に両派の違いは見られるのか、などについて比較検討することにする。\n\n Through Meiji period, regardless of an old or a new faction, a lot of Ruidaikushu（類題句集） were published. The writer of this paper investigated 106 volumes of Ruidaiku-shu which was edited by as it called haikai poets in “old faction” in Meiji period at first, then tried some consideration about the editing policy and issues of “Ki”（季） after use of the solar calendar, moreover about Meiji-no- shindai （明治の新題）. This article should be called a sequel. While spreading the range of the investigation in Ruidaiku-shu of the new faction, on editing Ruidaiku-shu, how each of the old and new faction introduce to enter Ku（句）, whether there are differences between the way to treat Ki after use of the solar calendar and the way to use Meiji-no-shindai were compared and examined.\n","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国文学研究資料館"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1880-2230","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"metadata only access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"越後, 敬子"},{"creatorName":"エチゴ, ケイコ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"16382","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"ECHIGO, KEIKO","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"16383","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"明治の類題句集 ―旧派と新派を比較して―","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"明治の類題句集 ―旧派と新派を比較して―"},{"subitem_title":"Ruidaikushu in the Meiji period","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"3","path":["37"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2014-11-10"},"publish_date":"2014-11-10","publish_status":"0","recid":"597","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["明治の類題句集 ―旧派と新派を比較して―"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-16T04:45:14.903844+00:00"}