WEKO3
アイテム
講演 皆川淇園（1734-1807） ―『淇園答要』と『名疇』の関係について―
https://doi.org/10.24619/00002706
https://doi.org/10.24619/000027067e4a55b9-fa5f-4c39-846b-0446aa559a67
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
講演 皆川淇園（1734-1807） ―『淇園答要』と『名疇』の関係について― (13.7 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 会議発表論文 / Conference Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-10-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 講演 皆川淇園（1734-1807） ―『淇園答要』と『名疇』の関係について― | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Minagawa Kien (1734-1807): the Relation between his Meichû and Kien tõyõ | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | conference paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.24619/00002706 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Boot, Willem Jan
× Boot, Willem Jan× BOOT, Willem Jan |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | It is always a moot point, of course, but I think that a case can be made for Meichû to be the most important of Minagawa Kien's many works, in the sense of the most authoritative formulation of his mature thought. The book (6 fascicles) is written in Chinese, and in the lexicographical mode. It consists of over sixty words, i.e. Confucians terms, which are defined and explained with help of many quotations from the Chinese Classics. To judge by the date of Kien's own preface, the book was finished in 1784, but it took another four years before the book appeared in print. It was not the kind of text, however, that would make the author's name a household word all over Japan. That may be the reason why Kien decided to write Kien tôyô. In composition, Kien tôyô partly overlaps with Meichû, and in the book he every now and then refers to the other text. In style, however, the two are completely different. Kien toyo is written in soro-bun, and composed in the form of a number of letters to an otherwise unnamed daimyo. In style and composition, Meichû and Kien tôyô show many resemblances to Ogyû Sorai's Benmei and Sorai-sensei tômonsho, and also the relation between these two texts seems comparable to the relation obtaining between the two compositions by Sorai. In my lecture, I will discuss both the individual texts of Meichû and Kien tôyô, and the inter-textual relations outlined above. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
国際日本文学研究集会会議録 en : PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON JAPANESE LITERATURE 号 29, p. 1-19, 発行日 2006-03-01 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国文学研究資料館 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0387-7280 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
