WEKO3
アイテム
研究発表 黄表紙の批判性の再考 ―青砥藤綱像を使用する寛政年間の黄表紙の特徴をめぐって―
https://doi.org/10.24619/00003678
https://doi.org/10.24619/00003678c752f9d4-6c7b-4dea-8289-9f833921081f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
研究発表 黄表紙の批判性の再考 ―青砥藤綱像を使用する寛政年間の黄表紙の特徴をめぐって― (1.0 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 会議発表論文 / Conference Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-06-08 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 研究発表 黄表紙の批判性の再考 ―青砥藤綱像を使用する寛政年間の黄表紙の特徴をめぐって― | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Rethinking Kibyōshi's Critical Side ――The Characteristics of Kibyōshi in Early Kansei Dealing with Aoto Fujitsuna―― | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | conference paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.24619/00003678 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Csendom, Andrea
× Csendom, Andrea× CSENDOM, Andrea |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The Kansei era’s kibyōshi is often called the Reform period’s kibyōshi （“Kaikaku no kibyōshi”）, which the critical artistic method for this genre was emphasized in the previous research of the same topic. In such famous kibyōshi as Bunbu Nidō Mangoku Dōshi or Ōmugaeshi Bunbu no Futamichi were, Matsudaira Sadanobu and his reform policies which were the main aim of kibyōshi’s sarcasm. However, by analyzing comprehensively this era’s kibyōshi dealing with politics, it is revealed that there were less critical or even positive evaluations of Sadanobu. For instance, Taihei Gongen Chinza no Hajimari, a kibyōshi from Kansei 1（1789）, that wasn’t widely noticed thus far, uses Aoto Fujitsuna’s portrayal, who was a historical hero in the Taiheiki, as an allude for Matsudaira Sadanobu. In this type of kibyōshi, using Fujitsuna as an image for Sadanobu, we are not able to recognize criticism against the young rōju, rather we take notice of some expectations regarding the new politics. The kibyōshi published one year later, from Kansei 2（1790）, Sadanobu’s positive evaluation has vanished. Still, this literary process can be explained with the rotation of the kibyōshi writer’s social status while the bushi authors were replaced with chōnin authors. In this research, a new approach of the valuation of kibyōshi published between Tenmei 8（1788） and Kansei 3（1791）will be presented regarding text alteration, the politically critical side of Reform period’s kibyōshi, detailed political information, and shift in the author’s social status, while arguing the genres expressive style pointing out that, in front of the common accepted theory, kibyōshi wasn’t the genre that fostered only critics against politics, however, in a certain period, it also made an affirmative political evaluation. In addition, exploration from the perspective of the author’s intention: why was Aoto Fujitsuna used as the metaphor of Matsudaira Sadanobu in the kibyōshi? Through analyzing literary genres and other historical sources, a brief examination of Aoto Fujitsuna’s character’s alteration from the latter part of the Middle Ages to the Edo period and point out that Fujitsuna’s image became a very stable ideal for the common people by the Kansei era, therefore Fujitsuna depicted in literary genres was able to spread a positive evaluation through the kibyōshi even though the genre used a critical expressive style. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
国際日本文学研究集会会議録 en : PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON JAPANESE LITERATURE 号 38, p. 47-60, 発行日 2015-03-31 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国文学研究資料館 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0387-7280 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
