WEKO3
アイテム
研究発表 現代文学批評によって「文学史」を考えなおす
https://doi.org/10.24619/00003960
https://doi.org/10.24619/000039600c797249-c966-42a7-a884-d433e04f2068
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
研究発表 現代文学批評によって「文学史」を考えなおす (7.3 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 会議発表論文 / Conference Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-08-05 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 研究発表 現代文学批評によって「文学史」を考えなおす | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Critical Theory and Japanese Literary History | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | conference paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.24619/00003960 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Whittier, Treat John
× Whittier, Treat John× WHITTIER, TREAT John |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Why is the writing of literary history, defined as the critical justification of a priveleged canon, suddenly so popular in Japan while moribund elsewhere? The skepticism with which literary theorists, many in Japan included, regard the claims of literary history to objective truth, and the widespread disdain in which sentimental criticism is now held, seem to have had a minimal impact on the most prominent interpreters of Japanese literature both in Japan and abroad, who continue to arbitrate without irony degrees of literary "value. "Several explanations are conceivable, including the Japanese critical establishment's general resistance to abstraction and its specific resistance to any theory which would minimize the role of literature's Mandarin elite. Alternately, historical conditions in the West (the emergence of extra-canonical groups of writers, the twentieth-century reaction to the Cartesian or Kantian idea of the "subject") that have proved inhospitable to the writing of literary history may not exist, in just the same form, in Japan. After looking at one example of a recent and acclaimed history of modern Japanese literature, I propose that future histories might seek to avoid the "affective fallacy" by taking not interpretation but rather the reception of text as the principal object of their inquiry, and thereby dispensing with the highly speculative, and slippery, project of determining value. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
国際日本文学研究集会会議録 en : PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON JAPANESE LITERATURE 号 10, p. 102-111, 発行日 1987-03-01 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国文学研究資料館 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0387-7280 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
