ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 国際日本文学研究集会
  2. 国際日本文学研究集会会議録
  3. 第33回

研究発表 『草枕』の「ユートピア」と一人称 ―語り手の機能について―

https://doi.org/10.24619/00002877
https://doi.org/10.24619/00002877
520623b4-3704-4f55-8f2a-449824abff3c
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
I3302.pdf 研究発表 『草枕』の「ユートピア」と一人称 ―語り手の機能について― (11.1 MB)
license.icon
Item type 会議発表論文 / Conference Paper(1)
公開日 2016-11-18
タイトル
タイトル 研究発表 『草枕』の「ユートピア」と一人称 ―語り手の機能について―
タイトル
タイトル Utopia in Kusamakura ("The Three-Cornered World") and the First Person\n―about a narrative function―
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
資源タイプ conference paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.24619/00002877
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 解, 璞

× 解, 璞

WEKO 25411

解, 璞

ja-Kana カイ, ハク

Search repository
XIE, Pu

× XIE, Pu

WEKO 25412

en XIE, Pu

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Kusamakura (Shinshōsetsu, 1906) was described by Natsume Sōseki as “being in a class by itself, which does not mean it is the best novel since the beginning of the world, though” (a letter to Komiya Hōryu, 1906) and it became a topic of interest as soon as it was published. About this novel, Akai Keiko pointed out that studies approached by “author’s idea” and “all sorts of images of the work” have been broken apart (Kusamakura Kenkyūshi Gaikan, and Houi, 1983) and Kamei Hideo pointed out that studies from “the perspective of narrative strategy” have not been carried out thoroughly (Kokubungaku, 1994, extra edition). Also with the increasing number of comparative studies of other works of the same period and works of foreign literature, Kusamakura has been read from various perspectives.
However, such studies as on “person, and connection with art” (Kokubungaku, 1987) pointed out by Nakajima Kunihiko, and on consideration of self-proclaimed painter by Kamei Hideo are uncommon. Taken a look at discourse of Souseki and criticisms such as Yo ga Kusamakura (1906), Bunsyō Hitokuchi Banashi (1906), and Shaseibun (1907) etc., Kusamakura was described as a “Shaseibun (descriptive writing style)” as a new movement, which was “never found in the West” and “nor in Japan, needless to say” and “it was completely different from ordinary novels”. Nevertheless, almost no research from such a stylistic perspective has been done.
This paper will look at the composition of a picture and scenery ( the connection of “Chi” and “Zu”) and the characteristics of verbal communication between “Yo” and surrounding people, especially the connection between “Yo” ’s consciousness in a text and Nami’s words in a conversational text. Also this paper will analyze the uniqueness of utopia that the first person “Yo” aimed at. Moreover, I will look into how “Kusmakura” in literature after Russo-Japanese War was recognized through comparison with other literary works on Russo-Japanese War.
書誌情報 国際日本文学研究集会会議録
en : PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON JAPANESE LITERATURE

号 33, p. 15-30, 発行日 2010-03-31
出版者
出版者 国文学研究資料館
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0387-7280
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 pdf
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 15:14:32.797969
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3