WEKO3
アイテム
式家文選學一斑 ―文選集注の利用―
https://kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/442
https://kokubunken.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/442ec8d58f2-6091-4b1c-b94c-48ba503b5f0d
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2014-11-07 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 式家文選學一斑 ―文選集注の利用― | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Acceptance and Development of the Wen hsuan in the school of Shiki-ke | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
| 著者 |
山崎, 誠
× 山崎, 誠× YAMAZAKI, Makoto |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | 本邦に於ける漢籍の講誦は学制の定めに見られる如く、特定の注釈に拠ってなされるのを通例とするが、文選の講読は数種の注釈を撰択して訓注を施すものであったらしい。古伝の昭明文選（無注）を会本の注釈で読む故に、互に本文を異にする場合も生じ、訓注も特定の注に限定されぬ重層性を帯びる結果となる。かような事実を古鈔本の欄外注や勘物に認めることが出来る。式家の訓法を伝えると称せられる九条本文選に、それら文選講誦の具体相を探り、本邦にのみ伝存する文選集注の利用状況を解明した。あわせて、平安末期衰微に向う博士家の文選学が、仁和寺を中心とする祖典の注釈活動に利用され、最後の光芒を放つ様相を一瞥した。 Chanting of Chinese classics in Japan is as it is seen in the regulation of the education system usually done by a specific explanatory note. However reading of Monzen (Wen hsuan, ancient Chinese Poems) selected several kinds of explanatory notes and seemed to give Kunchu (a commentary of the reading and interpretation of difficult characters). Because an old tradition Zhaoming monzen (no explanatory notes) was read by explanatory notes of Ehon（会本）, there was the case to be different texts from each other and Kunchu results in stratifying not to be restricted to specific explanatory note. Such a fact is possible to recognize in marginal and Kanmotsu (annotation of a book) of ancient manuscripts. In Kujobon monzen which was known as passing Kunpo of Shiki family, detailed aspects of those Monzen chanting were investigated and the use condition of Monzen shuchu (collected annotations) which has been passed down only in our country was elucidated. Also Monzen studies in the Hakase family which was on the decline in the late Heian period were used for the annotation activities of Soten mainly led by Ninnaji and the aspect to shoot the last shaft of light was glanced at. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
国文学研究資料館紀要 en : The Bulletin of The National Institute of Japanese Literature 号 15, p. 101-134, 発行日 1989-03-25 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国文学研究資料館 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0387-3447 | |||||
